> To sum up, by ignoring mind in nature we ignore ourselves—because the “world” is, for each of us, wholly a creation of our own mind, but based on the imperfect sense data we receive from the objective world. What we gain by accepting subjectivity as part of nature is a more complete science.
> We are now at a point where scientists and philosophers who study consciousness can roll up their sleeves and get busy testing the nature of consciousness in its many manifestations, and that data will, in turn, feed back into our theories of consciousness, and of physical reality more generally, in an ongoing dance of unfolding truth.
> We are now at a point where scientists and philosophers who study consciousness can roll up their sleeves and get busy testing the nature of consciousness in its many manifestations, and that data will, in turn, feed back into our theories of consciousness, and of physical reality more generally, in an ongoing dance of unfolding truth.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...onsciousness-scientifically-tractable
Vote 0
-
http://www.implications-philosophique...-quantique-du-probleme-corps-esprit-1
Vote 0
40 Bits par seconde
https://www.quora.com/Does-the-mind-r...omes-through-our-five-physical-senses
Vote 0
Le casque AlterEgo du MIT peut interpréter les mots que vous prononcez dans votre tête - CNET France 
-
http://www.cnetfrance.fr/news/le-casq...rononcez-dans-votre-tete-39866566.htm
Vote 0
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...ions/thinking-outside-the-quantum-box
Vote 0
Vu son dernier livre, la conclusion est ironique bien sur ;)
http://www.doublecause.net/index.php?page=ame.htm
Vote 0
-
http://lesimbecilesontprislepouvoir.com/2014/08/21/esprit-et-matiere
Vote 0
-
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2...can-alter-our-physical-material-world
Vote 0
