In a randomized-controlled double-blind study, subjects were unable to distinguish the computer art from two sample sets of acclaimed work created by flesh-and blood artists (one culled from the canon of Abstract Expressionist paintings, the other from works shown at the 2016 edition of Art Basel in Hong Kong). In fact, the computer-made pictures were often rated by subjects as more “novel” and “aesthetically appealing” than the human-generated art. The ensuing peer-reviewed paper sparked an unsettling art world rumor: Watson had learned how to paint like Picasso.
https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-e...ial-hard-painting-made-computer-human
Vote 0
-
https://www.newscientist.com/article/...ource=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Vote 0
-
http://www.presse-citron.net/cette-te...-peintures-photographies/#prettyPhoto
Vote 0
-
https://humanoides.fr/creation-musicale-artificielle-baidu
Vote 0
-
http://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/high-t...ettent-au-street-art.html?xtor=RSS-12
Vote 0
-
http://www.silicon.fr/prochain-rembra...-algorithme-microsoft-ing-144338.html
Vote 0
Les signets de cette page sont gérés par un administrateur. 